Comparative Analysis of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Drainage Retinotomy: LASER Alone Versus LASER with Amniotic Membrane Graft

Authors

  • Hussain Ahmad Khaqan Lahore General Hospital, Lahore Pakistan
  • Hafiz Atteq Ur Rehman Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hasnain Muhammad Baksh Lahore General Hospital, Lahore Pakistan
  • Ahmad Fauzan Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Zafar Iqbal Rothwell Family Practice, 618 Deception Bay Road, Deception Bay, 4508, Australia.
  • Neeta Maheshwary Helix Pharma Pakistan
  • Dilshad Hussain Helix Pharma, Pakistan
  • Athar Khan Liaquat College of Medicine & Dentistry Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v39i4.700

Keywords:

RRD (rhegmatogenous retinal detachment), Retinotomy (Amniotic Membrane Graft), PVR (proliferative Vitreoretinopathy), LASER

Abstract

Background: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a vision-threatening condition that requires timely surgical intervention to prevent permanent visual loss. Despite substantial advances in modern vitreoretinal surgery, the presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) continues to complicate management, often limiting anatomical success and functional recovery. Often, these cases need a drainage retinotomy to ease the tension and help reattach the retina. Conventional laser photocoagulation remains the standard method for sealing retinal breaks, but can induce thermal damage and postoperative scarring, limiting functional recovery. The use of human amniotic membrane graft (AMG) has recently attracted attention due to its anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and regenerative properties that promote retinal healing and reduce fibrosis. International evidence supports the potential benefits of AMG in complex retinal detachment repair; However, local data is limited. This study was designed to compare the anatomic and visual outcomes of drainage retinotomy treated with laser alone versus laser combined with AMG in patients with RRD complicated by PVR. Objective: To report the anatomical and visual outcomes in RRD patients worsened by PVR, undergoing Retinotomy with LASER only vs patients undergoing Retinotomy with Amniotic Membrane Grafts and LASER.

Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the department of Ophthalmology, Lahore General Hospital over a period of twelve months from 1st feburary2023 to 1st February 2024. A total of 20 patients, 14 males (70%) and 6 females (30%) were included in this study. The patients were diagnosed case of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by PVR. We divided the patients into two groups; A and B. Group A underwent retinectomy with LASER only and Group B underwent Retinectomy with Amniotic Membrane Grafts and LASER. The patients were followed up for 3 months after surgery.

Results: Surgical outcome was measured in terms of achieving complete anatomical closure and improvement of visual acuity. In our study 100% of the patients achieved complete anatomical closure whereas visual acuity improvement was seen more in the patients treated with AMG than those treated with laser alone.

Conclusion: Visual and anatomical outcomes were better in patients that underwent AMG with LASER for the treatment of retinotomy as compared to those who underwent LASER only.

References

Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK. Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100(2):289- 92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030291012.

Gonin J. The treatment of detached retina by searing the retinal tears. Arch Ophthalmol. 1930;4(5):621- 5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1930.004500621.

Lewis H. Peripheral retinal degenerations and the risk of retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(1):155- 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002?9394(03)00144?2.

Wykoff CC, Schwartz SG, Adelman RA, Brucker AJ, Flynn HW. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: evidence supports an individualised approach. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(11):1451- 3.https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol?2015?307651.

Warren A, Wang DW, Lim JI. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;51(3):271-9.

De Rötth A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with fetal membranes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1940;23(3):522- 5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1940.00860130586006.

Niknejad H, Yazdanpanah G, Kakavand M. Extract of fetal membrane would inhibit thrombosis and hemolysis. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85(2):197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.04.030.

Tseng SC, Espana EM, Kawakita T, et al. How does amniotic membrane work? Ocul Surf. 2004;2(3):177-87.

Caporossi T, Pacini B, De Angelis L, Barca F, Peiretti E, Rizzo S. Human amniotic membrane to close recurrent,

high myopic macular holes in pathologic myopia with axial length ? 30 mm. Retina. 2020;40(10):1946-54.

Caporossi T, Pacini B, Bacherini D, et al. Human amniotic membrane plug to promote failed macular hole closure. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18264. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14109.

Caporossi T, De Angelis L, Pacini B, Tartaro R, Finocchio L, Barca F, Rizzo S. A human Amniotic Membrane plug to manage high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(2):e252-6.https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14174.

Caporossi T, Tartaro R, De Angelis L, Pacini B, Rizzo S. A human amniotic membrane plug to repair retinal detachment associated with large macular tear. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97:821-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002699.

Caporossi T, De Angelis L, Pacini B, Rizzo S. Amniotic membrane for retinal detachment due to paravascular retinal breaks over patchy chorioretinal atrophy in pathologic myopia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30:392-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672119891415

Ramamurthy SR, Dave VP, Chou HD, et al. Retinotomies and retinectomies: A review of indications, techniques, results, and complications. Surv Ophthalmol. 2023;68(5):639-59.doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.06.012.

Everett LA, Paulus YM. Laser therapy in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Curr Diab Rep. 2021;21(9):1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892?021?01403?6.

Iannetta D, Chhablani J, Valsecchi N, et al. Epiretinal implant of human amniotic membrane to treat highly myopic macular hole retinal detachments: A novel surgical technique. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024;34(1):304-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721231206717.

Khaqan HA, et al. Amniotic Membrane Graft for the Treatment of Giant Refractory Macular Hole Closure. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2022;38(3):212-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003505

Chen Y, Chen S. Human amniotic membrane grafts for retinal breaks in diabetic tractional retinal detachment and combined tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). [Retracted] https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598?021?86804?z.

Ferreira MA, Maia A, Machado AJ, et al. Human amniotic membrane for the treatment of large and refractory macular holes: a retrospective, multicentric, interventional study. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2021;7(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942?021?00308?6.

Zeydanl? EÖ, Özdek ?, Yalç?n E, et al. Human Amniotic Membrane: A Seal for Complex Retinal Detachments.

Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024;54(5):268-74. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.56424.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Khaqan HA, Rehman HAU, Baksh HM, Fauzan A, Iqbal MZ, Maheshwary N, Hussain D, Khan A. Comparative Analysis of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Drainage Retinotomy: LASER Alone Versus LASER with Amniotic Membrane Graft. Proceedings S.Z.M.C [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Sep. 27];39(4):222-8. Available from: http://mail.proceedings-szmc.org.pk/index.php/szmc/article/view/700